Which of the following statements regarding join member interfaces are false when link aggregation works in manual mode?

Which of the following statements regarding join member interfaces are false when link aggregation works in manual mode?

• A. An Eth-Trunk cannot be nestled and a member interface cannot be an Eth-Trunk
• B. An Ethernet interface can join only one Eth-Trunk before adding it
• C. If the local device uses the Eth-Trunk, the remote interface must join the Eth-Trunk
• D. An Eth-Trunk can only work in Layer 2 mode

Answer: (D)

When evaluating the statement about join member interfaces in the context of manual mode for link aggregation, it is essential to clarify that an Eth-Trunk can function in different operational modes, including Layer 3 (network layer). Thus, stating that an Eth-Trunk can only work in Layer 2 mode is indeed false. Eth-Trunks are designed to facilitate link aggregation, allowing multiple physical Ethernet links to be bundled into a single logical link to enhance bandwidth and provide redundancy. They can operate at Layer 2, which deals with data link layer protocols, but they can also be configured to handle Layer 3 protocols, which are crucial for routing purposes. Therefore, asserting that Eth-Trunks are restricted solely to Layer 2 operation overlooks their versatility, as they can support Layer 3 functionalities, making this option incorrect. In contrast, the other provided statements reflect accurate principles regarding Eth-Trunk configurations in manual mode. For instance, the fact that an Eth-Trunk cannot be nestled means that an Eth-Trunk cannot serve as a member of another Eth-Trunk, and that an individual Ethernet interface can only be part of one Eth-Trunk at a time highlights the commitment of resources this configuration demands. Additionally, the stipulation that when a local device utilizes an

When evaluating the statement about join member interfaces in the context of manual mode for link aggregation, it is essential to clarify that an Eth-Trunk can function in different operational modes, including Layer 3 (network layer). Thus, stating that an Eth-Trunk can only work in Layer 2 mode is indeed false.

Eth-Trunks are designed to facilitate link aggregation, allowing multiple physical Ethernet links to be bundled into a single logical link to enhance bandwidth and provide redundancy. They can operate at Layer 2, which deals with data link layer protocols, but they can also be configured to handle Layer 3 protocols, which are crucial for routing purposes. Therefore, asserting that Eth-Trunks are restricted solely to Layer 2 operation overlooks their versatility, as they can support Layer 3 functionalities, making this option incorrect.

In contrast, the other provided statements reflect accurate principles regarding Eth-Trunk configurations in manual mode. For instance, the fact that an Eth-Trunk cannot be nestled means that an Eth-Trunk cannot serve as a member of another Eth-Trunk, and that an individual Ethernet interface can only be part of one Eth-Trunk at a time highlights the commitment of resources this configuration demands. Additionally, the stipulation that when a local device utilizes an